| | Satisfaction | Experience | |
|---|
| Name | Date | Helpfulness | Review | Overall satisfaction | Ease of use | Quality of Manufacture | Durability | Meets Expectations | more... |
|
|---|
| Amazon.com customer | 2008-12-09 | | Which camera do I choose???? | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I've been using a point and shoot camera for about 5 years now - I'm by no means a photographer, just an average dad trying to take some pictures. My son recently turned one and I've been finding it more and more difficult to capture those precious moments. I press the button on my point and shoot....delay...missed the shot. Also whenever I take photos indoor I've found they are always blurry or noisy, just not very good. So I elected to get a Digital SLR camera - wow they are expensive! I did very extensive research before making the most important decision. Which one do I get??? I decided to narrow my search to Canon and Nikon, the two top brands. I was considering the Canon Xsi, Canon 40D, and Nikon D90. I quickly decided the Xsi was not for me. On paper it looks great. It has a ton of great reviews and I'm sure it takes amazing pictures. The price was the cheapest of all the cameras I was considering. After visiting Best Buy and actually trying the cameras out the xsi felt like a toy compared to its big brother the 40D. Also the kit lens was very disappointing as far as zoom capabilities. I did like the 40D a lot. The body seems really solid and well build (even more so than the D90). I loved the 6fps rapid shooting (although I can't imagine I would every really need to shot quite that fast). The kit lens seems like a huge improvement over the wimpy one on the xsi. The camera seemed good to me but after picturing my wife using it, it seemed just a tad to "big and heavy". Some people might disagree. The D90 had a few features that really appealed to me. One of the main things I really liked about the D90 was the beautiful 3" VGA screen for reviewing. This screen was a big reason why I went with this camera over the Canon models. It's the same size but has 4 times the resolution. Why would you care about this? It's just really nice when you take a shoot you can immediately tell if you got it or not. With the canons I found you had to either zoom in or download to the computer before you could really tell if the photo came out well. The D90 also just had a lot of other tricks up its sleeve that I thought were nice. There is a HDMI output to hook this baby up to your fancy HDTV. The camera also has built in software that creates an animated slideshow of your pictures for viewing on the TV. Again, doesn't really effect image quality but it's a cool feature. There's also some neat post processing you can do right on the camera including red eye removal, black and white filter, or tilt the picture if you accidentally took it at a slight angle. Of course there is the movie mode also (lack of auto focus makes this feature a little disappointing actually). One final selling point for the D90 over the 40D was the kit lens. For me the kit lens is very important because I don't really plan on purchasing a bunch of different lenses and swapping them out all the time. I just want a decent "all purpose" lens. The 40D's 28-135mm kit lens just felt a little to "zoomed-in" for me. After playing with it I wanted to be able to zoom out more but was unable to. The D90's 18-105 feels like a pretty good range for me (keep in mind that these cameras have a 1.5 multiplier built in). The best advice I can give is to go try the cameras out before you order one. Just go with the one you feel most comfortable with, trust your gut. I've been very happy with my D90 but I'm sure all of the cameras I was considering would have been a huge step up from a point and shot.
| Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-12-06 | | Perfect choice | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Just few words. I got D90 after several years of using D70. Also used to shoot in studios with most Nikon and Canon bodies. Must say that D90 is very long step ahead from D70! If you choosing between D90 and D300 and you don't really need 14-bit color and not a "manual settings forever" guy, then D90 is perfect choice! | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-12-06 | | AWESOME pictures from an AWESOME camera! | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I was waffling between the far cheaper D60 or even the Canon Rebel XSi or the Nikon D90. I finally decided on the D90 mainly due to the large veiwing screen and the size and feel of the camera. All of the professional photographers that we have used to take family photos have had Nikon, so I was already leaning towards the D60 or the D90. The Nikon D60 has a 2.5" LCD display with 230,000 pixel resolution and a 170 degree viewing angle, which means your friends can gather around behind you and everyone will see the same image quality wherever they're standing. The Nikon D90 has a high resolution 3-inch LCD screen. The 920,000-pixel display has a 170-degree viewing angle and appears to be as nice as the new screens found on the D3 and D300. It makes checking focus and using Live view mode that much more pleasant. Live view is very cool because you can see what you are taking a picture of on the screen or you can use the view finder if it is sunny outside. This is also the first digital SLR to have HD movie mode. You do have to focus in order to record a movie but this is not replacing a video camera, this is just another video recording source in case you need it while you are shooting great photos. I am so pleased with this camera. I know it was more than the Canon but the camera FEELS like it should be more than the Canon. The Nikon D90 feels like a higher end professional Digital SLR camera. The pictures I have taken so far have been worth every penny. This was a GREAT purchase and Nikon's support is fantastic. You can call 24x7 and ask any question. They will walk you through whatever you need assistance with. I have called twice now, mainly due to the fact that I did not read the directions very well. Bottom line, I would buy this camera again. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-12-06 | | Try out the grip first!! | 6 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Based on all the great features and great reviews I had made up my mind to buy a D90 to replace my old D70s; but I always check out a camera in a brick and mortar store before I make my final decision. Good thing! This camera has a grip that just does not fit my hand very well. It feels awkward and cramped. I picked up a D40, a D80 and a D300 to compare and they were all much more comfortable to my hand than the D90. I liked the D300 and the D80 was fine; heck, even the smallish D40 felt pretty darn good. In a side by side comparison with the D80 I saw the problem immediately: the space between the RHS of the camera body and the buttons on the back is much narrower on the D90! In fact, part of my palm actually overlaps some of the buttons which gives me the 'cramping' effect. I really want to love this camera, but I know I can't hold it in my hand for very long with this grip. FYI: I wear an L in a golf glove or winter glove, so...if you are thinking of buying this camera...get to a store and pick it up first! It will be surprise if you are a previous Nikon user. So now its either wait for the price of a D300 to come down or buy a D200 at a bargain price. Happy Shooting! | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 6 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-12-03 | | Useful for any photographer | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | My review: I like it. The reasons are: The battery lasts 3 times longer than if it were in the D200. It's a tad smaller than the D200, and lighter. It has a dynamic range similar to film: by retaining detail in shadows and highlights. Slightly more sensitive in low-light. Slightly better image quality than the D300; superior image quality than the D200. Uses SD, SDHC memory cards that are much smaller than CF cards. It is all the camera one needs for photographs up to 4 feet by 5 feet. I've used it professionally: it is dependable. Automatic program mode makes the D90 useable for beginners. The ergonomic handling is perfect for small adult hands. High-quality plastic body is tough and corrosion-proof. Should last many decades. Can use most of the old, manual-focus Nikon lenses and other brands that have the Nikon bayonet mount. Can accept a T-mount adapter for lenses that are T-mount. Can accept an M39 (Leica screwmount) adapter for M39/LTM lenses (makes the lens a macro lens). The D90 is a fraction of the price of a D300. Carl Zeiss makes lenses for the Nikon digital slrs.
| Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-12-01 | | D90 vs. D40 | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I am fairly new to photography. Last year I got the D40. I just upgraded to the D90 because I was tired of futzing with the white balance of the D40, and I wanted more low-light sensitivity (better ISO), as well as the flexibility of using faster lenses, many of which are not AF-S. I have been very impressed with the D90. I'm comparing it to the D40. The things that I think are important are ranked from most to least important. 1. Active D-lighting (ADR). This has gotten me photos with large dynamic ranges of light (highly shaded subjects with a bright background) that I would have otherwise botched. Also, we rent a house where they did a quick paint job in white, but there are splotches of beige and light green underneath. We've never successfully taken photos of this with the D40 or our point-and-clicks. The D90 pulls these out (without flash) to the point where it's easier to see them in the photo than by eye, and it nails the colors! I also suspect that the ADR is helping tame the noise at high ISO levels (see #3 below). 2. White Balance. The white balance is a big improvement over the D40, which botched AWB lots of times. If you look closely, it's not perfect, but close enough for all but the perfectionists, and the beauty is it works in Auto. That means that you can focus on taking pictures and not on fiddling with your settings so much. There's also a lot of flexibility to set your AWB defaults with a lot of precision. 3. Low light photography. I take a lot of shots indoors without flash. Until very recently, there weren't any f/1.4 prime lenses that were AF-S (needed on D40). The D90 helps in 2 ways: a) takes AF-D lenses and b) has better high ISO performance. I did controlled tests using my 55-200mm VR lens at 55mm (f/4) and looked at ISO sharpness and color on the D40 and D90. I did it in manual mode, following the exact procedure of Ken Rockwell (tripod, VR off, remote trigger). I find that the D90 is between 1 and 2 stops better ISO than the D40. D90/ISO 6400 is too dirty, but D90/3200 is pretty usable. With the D40 at ISO 800, the sharpness is slightly better than the D90 at 3200 (but worse than D90/1600), but there's a lot more out-of-control, day-old pizza look in dark sections with the D40 at 800 than the D90 at 3200 (I'm guessing that ADR is helping here). The D90's color starts to fade at little at ISO 1600, and drops more at 3200, then quite a bit at 6400. 4. The 11-point AF has helped get things in focus compared with the D40's 3 spots. AF also feels faster. Autofocusing is a big improvement. 5. I also really like that it's quicker changing ISO, WB and QUAL because of dedicated buttons. I've also set AF as my top choice under My Menu, making it 1 button away as well (hit the Fn button). This was another Rockwell suggestion. 6. The screen is amazing, as others have said. Also, you can navigate a zoomed image on the screen really fast. 7. I'm also looking forward to using my SB600 flash remotely in commander mode (you can't do that on the D40). Another observation: I'm not that familiar with the D300 and D700, but the D90 feels pretty solid compared to the D40. I thought that weight would help stabilize hand-held shots, but I also find that it's shutter is stronger than the D40, and that vibration tends to cancel out its heavier weight in terms of holding the camera still. For someone who doesn't like to adjust the manual settings very much, the main benefits of the D90 over the D40 are the ADR and WB. These upgrades will probably appear in the D40 replacement in ~6 months. I might wait for that. For others who use their manual settings regularly, this is quite a camera. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-12-01 | | Big leap from a Point and Shoot | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I am a complete amateur with no desire to enter into the professional world. I just want to take great pics of my kids. I LOVE this camera!!!!! I use the auto setting and the pics are unbelievable. From the moment I picked it up out of the box (literally) it has surpassed all my expectations and I've captured some truly amazing shots. My point-and-shoot (canon sd1100 which I still keep in my purse for snapshots) maybe, maybe would have been fast enough to catch the same look on my kids faces, but the depth of field and color from the d90 are just breathtaking. I'm sure if I learned to use all the settings I could do even more. And eventually I will, because it does seem pretty easy to navigate the menus and the buttons are all pretty clear. For now, I just wanted to move up to a higher image quality from the point-and-shoots, and the entry level DSLRs felt too plasticy and cheap for their price. This does not. It is still plastic, but feels solid, not like I could break it with too tight a grip. The only real problem I had with it was the shoulder strap was ugly and uncomfortable. I found a really nice replacement strap at a camera store for about $15. So if you are an amateur just looking for something better than what's available on the point-and-shoot market, this is a very useable, non-intimidating camera that will suit you needs. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-29 | | Wow is all I can say | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | There are plenty of reviews out there, and I don't want to be redundant. So here are some helpful points that I had a hard time ferreting out when doing my research before pulling the trigger on this purchase, given that I was upgrading from a D60 and that I am, like many who are reading reviews on this product, not a professional: 1. I owned the D40, then the D60. So this is my third Nikon. I had trouble deciphering how my lenses, purchased for the D40/D60, would behave when used in this new model. The answer is that the D90 handles all of them perfectly. This includes lenses that have the HSM built in (the Hyper Sonic Motor is packaged in the lens, because the D40/D60 range doesn't have a built in auto-focus motor) as well as those with no internal motor. The D90 has an internal focus motor, so all lenses built for Nikon cameras will auto-focus, including the Nikon 50mm f1.8 lens that I had to manually focus in the D60. 2. The D90 is heavier, but certainly not uncomfortable to hold or carry. Weight will not be a discouraging factor in purchasing this camera. 3. The D90 takes different batteries, so any spares you have for the earlier models will not work on it. Battery life is truly outstanding. I am not even going to buy a spare battery. 4. The user interface is completely different from the D40/D60. I found it intuitive however. The functionality is just superb, much easier and more flexible. This is a pro level camera with the ease of use of a high end amateur camera. 5. Live view is a great enhancement. Really. Overall, there is nothing I can say negative about the D90. It's everything I was hoping it would be, and it's so worth the money to upgrade. I'm selling the D60 for half what I paid - and doing it gladly - because the D90 is worth more than it's being sold for. I absolutely highly recommend it. I also thought I would offer some lens advice, because I had trouble finding a reviewer that just cut to the chase and said "look, just do this." So, look, just do this: I do NOT recommend the kit lenses that you can obtain bundled with the D90. Get the body only, and buy yourself that Nikon 50mm f1.8. It's a no-brainer at the price point, and the images I have already achieved have been just excellent. For the rest of your lenses, I highly recommend Sigma. I own the 18-200, the 10-20, and the 150-500. I cannot say enough positive things about the quality of the lenses or the images. Pack the 50mm and the 18-200 superlens for normal occasions. If you can stand the extra weight, you absolutely cannot go wrong with the 10-20 for landscapes, it just pulls in everything and the quality is shocking. The 150-500 is enormous, you are not going to want to carry that thing around, but when you need it, you really need it. I captured images of my son playing in a soccer game that blew me away; could not have gotten the shots without the big lens. Get the lenses in the order I have specified if you cannot afford them all. I have just learned all this over the past 2 years. I am no expert but I have discovered the joy of capturing great images that you just cannot get from a point-and-shoot. I think once you see the quality you can achieve with a better camera, you will be thrilled with the decision to spend the money and the energy. And Nikon has truly produced the best camera at this price point in the world. It's a pro camera with an amateur price and it's very easy to use. Words really don't do it justice; you need to experience it to understand. Any questions, please send me a comment. Happy to help! | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-29 | | Best Nikon for the dollar | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I own the D80 and D40 and love them both. The D90 is just an outstanding camera in so many ways. What I like the most about this camera is the ease of use. It is by far the easiest camera in the Nikon line yet. The large LCD screen allows me to see exactly what I am doing at all times. For me, over 40 years old, I have a hard time seeing the small top mounted LCD so I love this large one in back. The navigation is so well done and you can navigate all your important settings with a few simple clicks. As for the actual photos....it's a Nikon - so they are great! My only word of caution is to beware of the high ISO capability of this camera. At 3200 ISO I personally do not like the quality of my indoor low light photos of people. The colors are very harsh. So I set it to a max of 1600 when I'm shooting people and I get much better looking images. Other than that it is a great camera. In all honesty the D40 takes just as good of pictures, but the D90 is more fun to use. So if you love your gadgets get this camera you won't be sorry. If money is a primary concern, then go with the D40; it's a great low cost camera -for $550 with two kitted lenses you can't go wrong. If you are eying a D80, then get the D90 instead as it is well worth the extra money. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-29 | | The best camera under $2000 | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I recently upgraded from a D40x to a D90 and the difference completely blew me away. The live view & video is a nice plus, but the best thing about the D90 is the excellent picture quality at high ISO settings. Shooting at ISO 1600 on the D90 looks better than ISO 800 on the D40x. The D90's controls are a lot easier to use. Instead of having to go to the menu for everything, you can set the ISO, image quality, etc. with a single button. The D90's lens support is also a lot better. It has an internal auto focus motor, so I can use auto focus with my 50mm/f1.8 lens. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-28 | | miimages | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Fantastic dslr! Truly amazing photos can be realized with this precision/professional high quality camera, provided you learn its capabilities and utilize its options to create the photos you will be proud of. The D90 is inspiring as well as fast and versitile, in all lighting situations, for fast moving or stationary subject matter. I'm having a blast everytime I see an opportunity to pick it up! | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-23 | | Can't beat it | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I have to admit that coming from a D40 background I didn't think the learning curve would be that much, but this camera is full of features (it is after all a baby version of the D300) with extra knobs and a top LCD screen so it will take you a little while to learn about all the features. I look at this as a good thing because I was starting to get a little bored with my D40 and had reached its limits. So if this is your first DSLR and you're on a budget, it MAY be a good idea to hold off on this and learn with a lesser camera first so you would appreciate it more (and save a little money) If you're a serious amatuer, the camerea itself is a beautiful thing. the high ISO performance is awsome. Once I learned about the secondary control wheel, i could change my camera settings much faster than the D40. Having an Autofocus motor also has opened up a whole new world of classic nikkor lenses which surprisingly autofocus fast. Flash commander mode works like a charm too. Overall a great great camera for the money and I don't regret it one bit. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-22 | | Nikon D90 | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Best DSLR I've ever owned. Very quick and easy to manipulate for great photos. It Packs so much features for every situation, and the quick function button makes it easy to control, the most used tasks. In Matter of quality, I shoot at iso 1600 and the photos are very usable and clear. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-18 | | YOU WILL LOVE THIS DSLR! | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Just do yourself a big favor and just get this camera... happy days will soon come... Excellent control and user interface layout... low light photography with the kit lens alone is a knock-out!... 4.5 frames/sec. got you covered for action shots... the HD video feature is a plus... but you'll be turned off by the mediocre audio quality... Feature by feature the best pro-sumer DSLR to date... Easily, the camera which bridges the consumer and professional photographers... so why are you still sitting there?... go get it! | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-15 | | Continuous DSLR Improvement | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I upgraded from the D80, which was an upgrade from the D50. Not surprisingly, the D90 is miles ahead of both cameras. The image quality is superb. For some reason I never fell in love with my D80. It seemed to struggle with proper exposure. Strangely, my D50 didn't have that problem. But the D90 appears to get the exposure correct, most of the time. I really like the ability to adjust color saturation in-camera. The auto focus is excellent and the very fast frame rate in burst mode is great for sports shooting. The LCD screen is one of the main improvements. It is very large and bright. I'm not going to review the video mode - I didn't buy the camera for that reason. I liked the D50, tolerated the D80, but love the D90. Isn't technology progress great? | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-15 | | Moved from D40x to D90 and all I can say is WOW!!! | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I was going back and forth between the 90 and the 300. Obviously the 300 is a slightly more professional camera with a better frame, faster shutter, better autofocus, etc., but the D90 is so close to it and comes with a slightly better sensor and is $500 cheaper. Also, it has video. Now, before you stop reading because I mentioned that, let me make this statement. Video had nothing whatsoever to do with my decision. I had no interest in using a DSLR for video. But now that I've played with it, I think it is incredible. Now, it won't replace my camcorder but it will allow me to capture brief (<5 min) videos of things my child does that I would otherwise have to capture by switching physical cameras. The video quality if frankly amazing. The sound could be a little better, but is more than adequate. Now, on to the photography portion. The image quality between my D40x and the D90 is certainly noticeable. Pictures are clearer and more vibrant. All of the features that I used to have to access through the menu system (bracketing, image quality, burst mode, exposure, etc) are all available quickly using buttons and wheels on the camera. This is making a world of difference. The kit lens isn't the best by any stretch of the imagination but I have to be honest - it is better than I was expecting. I will try to post more as I continue to use it. But if you're considering moving up to a D90, DO IT!!! You won't regret it. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-11 | | Great device & great service | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Got the camera and the 18-200 lense a few weeks back. I am upgrading from a D70. Overall, I am very satisfied with the quality of the pictures - much better response in low light - higher ISO and better focus than the 70. Love the lens as well - this will be all I need for everything. I did have an issue with the camera where I was getting F-- errors intermittently - depending on how I held the camera. This is a lens error per documentation. I was also getting CHA errors on the camera which is a chip error and only recoverable by removing the battery. Given that I was only 2 weeks into the camera I spoke with Amazon and exchanged the unit and lens for a replacement. I am confident that the new unit, which I got very quickly from Amazon - will function fine. Great unit and the video is a great feature. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-11 | | Advice from Professional Photographers | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I am not a camera expert at all. I wanted to take a digital SLR class, and to do so, I needed to buy a digital SLR. I was looking at the Canons in the $650 price range. I mentioned this to a friend of mine who is a professional photographer. She said that if I had any willingness at all to spend more, I should get the Nikon D90 - that it stood alone in class - it was the only pro-quality camera that was priced as though it were not a pro camera. This is what she said "This camera is sick and does video too. You may have seen the ads for it on TV. It has these brand new Nikon sensors which are incredible at shooting at all light levels. A lot of people are saying it's technically almost the same as my five thousand dollar camera. It's the kind of camera which is making pros scared that people will not hire pros any more." A professional photographer I trust endorsing it to this level, basically telling me that it was my only option - that was enough for me. More than my analyzing a chart of what features it has and what it doesn't - things I don't understand yet. So I bought the camera and brought it to work, and a coworker's husband is a professional photographer and he said that the Nikon D90 was his backup camera and he can't tell the difference. So that makes two pros who unequivocally say it stands alone in its class. So I'm not a pro, and what I can say is that it was very easy to learn, the video quality is also actually quite good, I've been taking pictures that look great, and the battery lasts forever. Also, any of my friends who know I have a camera drool when they find out I have the Nikon D90. The short answer is this - either trust me that I've had two pros tell me what I've told you, or find a professional photographer and ask them about the Nikon D90. I'm positive that they will tell you that there's nothing comparable unless you want to spend 5 times as much. Sometimes you just want the expert to point and say - that one, that's the right choice - your only choice. Sometimes you don't want to analyze tables of features and try to make heads and tails of it. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-11 | | Good choice for me | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I have been steadily moving up in cameras and it was time to make the jump to a DSLR. This camera is a little on the pricey side for a first DSLR, but you wont regret it a bit. The images it produces are fantastic. I really enjoy low light photography, and I have been able to grab some really nice shots have pretty high ISO's even without a tripod (it's not easy, but the camera goes a long way to make it work if you can just hold steady.) The feature set is a bit overwhelming at first, but the great thing about the camera is that if you are coming from a point-n-shoot world, out of the box this camera has enough automation to make it possible to start taking good photos right away. I picked up enough from the quick start manual to be able to put the lens on and go. Everything is at your fingertips. The controls are laid out great and the menus are easy to navigate. This is my first Nikon and all the reviews I have read are true, Nikon puts together as much ease of use as they can into a very robust camera. The kit lens is what you would expect it to be. It handles most basic shooting needs. Again, this is my first DSLR, so it is perfect for general photography. I have been able to get some really nice close up shots and it can pull in good to get some great action shots of my son playing soccer. I have found, though, that I am going to need to start saving for a couple of additional specialty lens's to really do to telephoto and macro shots right, but if you are on a budget and/or need to grab just one lens to run with, the kit lens does a good enough job. The camera isn't too heavy and feels good in your hand. The liveview is pretty much worthless. Not really the camera's fault, just the nature of what has to happen for liveview to work. The focus lock is terribly slow, and the shutter lag is horrible. That being said, it is a DSLR, and if you are looking to get into that arena, just having the liveview is a nice "bonus" on the occasion that you might need to get a shot on a tripod that is set up higher or lower than your eye level. I give Nikon credit for including it. The icing on the cake is the ability to shoot HD video. A still and separate video camera really are needed to take shots of any serious nature. The right tool for the right job holds true. BUT, it is nice to be able to flip it over to liveview and start recording. When I am out taking stills, that's what I am doing, so the video camera stays home. If something happens that just screams for motion, it does the job very sufficiently. Again, don't toss your video equipment, and don't buy the camera based off of this feature. It's a great camera on it's own, the video capabilities are just extra fun on the side. You can't go wrong with this rig. I grabbed an 8gb SD card to give me plenty of room for RAW shooting and video, and getting it all through Amazon was a wonderful experience that I would highly recommend. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-11-11 | | D90 versus D80 | 10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I purchased a D90 this weekend. I had used a D80 for over two years and loved it. The reason I purcahsed the D90 were as follows: Amazing clarity at 1600+ IS0. I live near Seattle and most of the days the sun is not out. I am an avid bird watcher (www.johnandcindi.blogspot.com)and need to bump up the ISO with my long lenses (Nikon 70-300MM VR, Tamron 200-500MM) to keep the shutter speed up. So far I LOVE this camera. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | |
| |