| Products Electronics & Photo GPS Handheld Garmin Forerunner 301 | Satisfaction | Experience | |
|---|
| Name | Date | Helpfulness | Review | Overall satisfaction | Ease of use | Quality of Manufacture | Durability | more... |
|
|---|
| Amazon.com customer | 2008-05-06 | | I own 4 Garmin 301's and have for the past 3 years. | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I actually own 4 Garmin 301's and have used this product since they came out about 3 years ago. Me and my wife are triathletes and we both have 1 mounted on our bike and we use the other for the run. Battery life is excellent at around 8-10 hours or so. Although the battery won't last long enough to get us through an Ironman race (which is why we each own 2) This unit is certainly one of my favorite pieces of technology I own and I use it nearly everyday. I also have a highend Polar (720i) and much prefer my Garmin over the Polar. Some reviewers state that the heartrate monitor portion of the device is not very good and reports erroneous heartrates. I know exactly what they are referring to but the fix is very simple. You have to wet the chest strap before you put it on. If you don't then, yes the HR monitor will occationally report incorrectly. Believe me I have put the these 301's through the ringer and they perform! I train for 8-10 months for a single race and would not show up on race day with equipment I didn't fully trust would get me to the finish line. Garmin support is outstanding as well. I had a 301 a few years back that started powering down all by itself for no reason. I called up Garmin and they swapped my old one out for a new one for free. One feature I really wish they would add though is the ability to add maps to the navigation screen. There's been more than a few times that I got lost out on a long ride and even though the 301 has a navigation screen it won't really help you navigate your way back home. It just leaves a bread crumb trail to retrace your path back home if you need to. Another really nice feature that this has is the ability to set the backlight to stay on permanently so when your running really early in the morning your not fumbling trying to find the light button. No other HR monitor that I know offers this feature. If I could give the Garmin 301 6 stars I would.
| Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2008-01-23 | | great product | 8 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Product works great!. Pros; Respectable GPS signal, easy interface, good interactive training programs, motionbased website tracks your activity. Cons: Weak GPS signal in wooded areas, large bezel. Makes running more enjoyable. If your mission based and like to track your work. Get this! | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-11-11 | | Love the Forerunner 301 !!! | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I highly recommend the 301. I have not had any problems with it. It works great and accurately every-time that I have used it. In the last three months I have used it at least thirty times and it works flawlessly. I have never had problems with the GPS tracking my position while running outdoors, and never had any problems with the heart-rate monitor either. This device is very lightweight for all the features that it offers and the screen is easily readable. This GPS has motivated me to run more often, trying new routes, and made it more fun. I hope this helps to make your decision easier. I HAVE NO REGRETS and I think it was worth every penny. Howard | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-10-09 | | Freedom! | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I bought the 301 from Amazon a few weeks ago, and it has worked flawlessly. Heart rate and distance both track quite well. There are some great review comments already on the board, so I'll only add a few new thoughts: 1. Freedom! The biggest surprise that I've found is how the 301 provides me with a sense of freedom when running. I no longer have to stay on pre-measured routes, or wonder how far I've gone when running in unfamiliar territory. I can just turn on the 301 and then run as an explorer throughout the area that I'm in. The 301 keeps track of distance, so I know when I am reaching my target mileage and should be turning for home. It hadn't occurred to me how freeing this would feel! 2. Location Tracking. I too have found that the location tracking is a bit off at times. This is for two reasons that I've seen. First, due to the +/- 22 feet resolution that I get from the 301, it will sometimes measure my path as a slight zigzag even when I'm running in a straight line. Second, since the 301 only takes a measurement every few seconds, it doesn't always see exactly when I've turned a corner so it often cuts the corner when measuring distance. The best way that I've been able to see this is when mapping my route over a satellite image. It becomes quite obvious when I see the data showing me in a yard instead of on the sidewalk! Most of these errors tend to balance each other out, though, so the measurement of my total distance seems to be quite good. I tested this out by using SportsTracks (a freeware alternative to Garmin-owned MotionBased that's quite good.). SportsTracks allows me to edit my run data on a satellite view, changing my route so that I stay on sidewalks and don't cut corners. As I change the route, SportsTracks automatically recalculates the total distance. In the few runs of 5 miles so far, correcting the errors has changed the run by only 0.02 miles. Not bad! 3. Pace Tracking. I too have found that the pace reading varies a bit while running. This is because of the variation in location tracking that I've mentioned above. To keep the readings from bouncing all over the place, Garmin averages multiple pace readings before displaying them. The amount of averaging can be adjusted in the settings menu. I've used the out-of-box setting and it looks like the 301 averages readings for 5 to 10 seconds. The easiest way to see this occurring is to run at a steady pace and then start walking, and notice how long it takes the readings to finally settle down to show a walking pace. So, overall, the pace measurement is pretty accurate as long as I'm running at a consistent pace for more than 5 to 10 seconds (which is usually the case). 4. Virtual Partner. I also like the Virtual Partner feature, which allows me to have a pacesetter during my runs. The 301 then tells me how far ahead or behind I am relative to this pacesetter. I'll be using this during my next marathon, where my Virtual Partner will be set to run 26.2 miles in 4 hours and 22 minutes (a 10 minute pace - yes, I am slow!) That way I can regularly tell whether I'm ahead of or behind my target finishing time. Very cool!
| Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-10-05 | | Exceeded Expectations | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I was worried after reading the other reviews but didn't want to buy the more expensive models. As a result, I kept all the packing materials and documents when unpacking it (so that I can return it if it was as bad as the reviews made it out to be). Since it arrived, I have used it for running, biking, indoor aerobics, and weight training. I did not have the problem with either the GPS or the HRM. Once GPS is locked, it doesn't create any problem, but it does take 20 seconds or so to get the signal. The heart rate monitor did not stop working at any time except when I was doing weights which led to movement of the strap. When biking on a wooded trail, I continued to get the GPS signal. If I start moving before locking the signal from the satellite the unit does not get the signal at all (so it is better to wait the few extra seconds before starting out). While using it indoors, my objective is to get the heart rate over the entire period I am working out. When I switch off the GPS, i am able to do this without any problem. I am using two softwares with it right now - at some point in time I will figure out which one to make the main software. Other than the training center that came with the unit (actually I downloaded the latest version), I am using sportstrack which is a free software. Thanks to the earlier reviewer from whom I learnt about this free software which works great - it has several analysis options as well as mapping options. At no point did I have a problem with the unit - either the HRM or the GPS. I think it is a great unit and worth every buck I paid for it at Amazon. I have two issues wih the unit and neither of them is so critical as to reduce the rating of the product. First, I would like to see a better software - Sportstrack is significantly better. I am still using Garmin's because it allows me to see the heart rate zones over the run better. Second, I should be able to have two users of the device. Overall, I am very happy with the product and am writing the review because my expereince was much better than what the earlier reviews made me expect from this product.
| Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-08-11 | | A must have for runners | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I don't know how I ever ran without one of these. It tells you everything you need to know about your run so you can plan future runs. The 301 comes with a USB connection to the computer (as opposed to a serial connection). Just this feature alone justifies buying it over the 201 model if you want to download the information to your computer. I have had this for 2 years and have loved it every time I run. The only issue I have with it is its satellite signal strength. Sometimes it has a hard time getting locks on satellites but I can't justify spending the extra $ to get the 305 just for the infrequent times that it has weak satellite signals. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-06-08 | | worth the money | 2 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I bought it in dec 2005 for Xmas. I have been using it 3 to 4 times a week when paddling, ie 6 to 10 hours a week. It takes forever to acquire sattelites, whatever the weather is... The heart rate displayed is sometimes fuzzy. I never managed to use the trainig center software. It just doesn't detect the gps unit when it is plugged to the computer. I tried to install this software on 3 different PCs : one with Win98SE, the second with WinXPFamilySP2 and the other with WinXPProSP2. I installed the usb gps drivers updates, the new version of the Trainig Center and i even updated the unit sofware... When I mailed to Garmin to ask for help and/or info the only answer i got was "make sure the unit is connected to the computer when you run the software" !!! Do they really think their consumers are so stupid ? Today, my forerunner301, just six month old, is not working at all. Impossible to switch it on, and when i plug it to its charger, i don't get any message on the screen. I am very disapointed. Hope the 1 year warranty is not a lie... I sent an email to garmin, they answered me very kindly. All I had to do was to send the device with 25$, then they sent me a new unit. This new gps acquire sattelites faster than the precedent and the heart rate values are more accurate. Thank you Ms Sharon Tang (Garmin Taiwan) | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 2 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-04-20 | | Working great for my exercise | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I was concerned about this product because of the negative reviews and particularly about the heart monitor. But I received it the next day after ordering from Amazon - whose service continues to get better for me - and I immediately charged the battery and then set up my profile. The next morning I used it for the first time and the heart rate monitor worked flawlessly for me. The GPS was exceptional as well. The heart rate monitor worked as well or better than my trusty Polar and they agreed with each other, too. The only negatives I experienced were: 1) that the unit seemed a little bulky to me at first but I gradually became accustomed to it; 2) the lap button is near the start/stop button and I run in the dark so I had a bit of trouble with laps. I think I'll get the hang of the buttons soon. Also the Training Center software did not work and I had to download the latest version from the web site. But I like the training center software just fine for my needs. I would recommend it. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-04-17 | | Lives up to expectations - and more! | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I waited a couple of weeks before reviewing to be sure I had a good sense of how well this device performs over time. So, here are my impressions. The Garmin Forerunner 301 is great! The GPS is very accurate. One time I used it while driving in my care and it measured my distance to work at 17.5 miles. I then went to an on-line mapping/routing program, and give it the same path. It returned a distance of 17.5 miles! Battery life is amazing. It re-charges in less than 4 hours, and then it is good for 13-14 hours. I have never run out of battery, or even come close. First, it is very comfortable to wear (I recommend, though, not wearing it on bare skin but over a shirt sleeve, as it won't get sweaty this way). The strap is strong and comfortable, and once on you don't even notice the device is there. It feels strong too, although I don't want to try it, it feels like it would survive drops very well. The screen is recessed, therefore making it quite protected. Displayed info is very intuitive, LARGE, and customizable. When it first arrives it is set up for pace (minutes/mile), but I changed it to speed (miles/hour). It also allows using metrics (km/hour). I use it mostly for bike rides, and to figure out best routes to drive to work. I therefore separate these two into two sports: Biking and I use Running for the car. Thus, I can keep these datasets separate. I record bike rides, which includes altitude, grade, speed, position, and heart rate. Later the included software can be used to analyze the session (note: the included software didn't work when first installed, but the lastest version found on the Garmin website worked the first time and flawlessly since, FYI, I have a Windows XP pro system). I've read some complaints about the heart monitor. Well, I've had 4 bike riding sessons, and it workd great on the first two. Then, it worked very intermitently on the 3rd. But, I figured out why! One thing not mentioned in the manual is that the heat monitor chest attachment has two strap connectors on each side. The monitor works virtually perfectly, IF you have it so it is tight-but-not-too-tight, AND those two snap connectors on the side are SNAP-LOCKED into place! If NOT snap-locked, the monitor moves around a bit over time, and loses connection and gives bad readings (>200). But when snapped, it works great! So those who experienced this problem might not have done this. I did this on my fourth bike trip, and it worked all the time, apart from one 15 second glitch. When the heart rate monitors is working, the included software can be used to plot lots of different things on comparative graphs, and calculates approximate calorie usage. I like to use it to review (re-live) old rides, and keep track of totals (like miles driven this year). Using on-line programs (such as Motion Based, owned by Garmin) one can convert the info to such formats as Google Earth (then you can replay your bike ride on a photo map of the Earth!). I'm amazed that in this day and age there is a device that actually does what it says it does! And it's not at all expensive for what it can do. It's not perfect, but definitely in the top 20% (heck, I'd give it a numerical rating of 95%, which is 4.75 out of 5), so 5 stars is my vote! :) | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-03-30 | | Not Reliable Enough for Training | 2 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Two major problems with the Forerunner 301, which I notice have been mentioned several times in other reviews: 1) Poor GPS reception, and 2) Unreliable Heart Rate Monitor. I bought the 301 primarily for distance running, with a secondary use as a hiking companion. As a hiking GPS it's of little value, which was expected. I had thought that at the very least it would display lat/long coordinates, but in fact it doesn't do that unless you enter a waypoint. Almost useless for navigation. However, the 301 was designed to be a training aid, but it fails at that, too... 1) One major asset of having a GPS for training is that you can measure your distance traveled over any course. If I decide in the middle of a long run to take a spontaneous detour, I don't have to go out later using the car's odometer to measure how many miles I added. This feature works OK, but the 301 frequently loses satellite lock. It regains the lock within a minute or so, which usually isn't a problem unless you're running some winding trails. This biggest problem with the frequent loss of satellite lock is with the pace calculation. I was really looking forward to knowing my running pace at any point during a run (it even displays pace in minutes/mile) but this calculation uses a rolling average. Whenever the 301 loses a lock, your pace begins to slow down (since your distance traveled remains the same) until suddenly it regains lock and the pace shoots up. As a result, whenever I look at the pace I can never be certain that I am actually running that pace! A great feature rendered useless by the high frequency of losing satellite locks. 2) The heart rate monitor (HRM) never worked. I tried everything - replaced the battery, wet the electrodes, wore it on my chest, wore it on my back, both running hard and standing still, and NEVER ever got the 301 to communicate with the HRM. Is it too much to ask of Garmin to test their products before shipping them out? I was extremely disappointed. Ultimately I returned my Forerunner 301 to Amazon for a full refund. If I can't make use of the pace calculation and can't depend on the HRM, then I may as well buy a cheap ol' GPS for measuring distance and hiking, and do the pacing math in my head. Hopefully their new Forerunner 205/305 can improve on these failings, but I'm not going to buy one anytime soon. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 2 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-02-27 | | Helpful product | 8 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I purchased the garmin 301 after my garmin 201 died. I figured rather than pay $69 to have it fixed I was better off to buy a new one and have all the added features. I love the garmin products, I use them to train for marathons and I find it very helpful to know the pace, time, and distance without having to try and figure it out. I've been slightly disappointed when running in the woods to find that I lose my signal (and we aren't talking deep in the woods either). Luckily, these times were on measured courses, or else I would have been ticked off because it wouldn't have been at all accurate. I feel this is a good product to aid in tracking your progress, although you're better off to get the 201 (for less money) unless you know you will wear the heart rate monitor strap. I found the heart rate monitor uncomfortable to run in for long periods of time. Also I do want to mention that my first garmin died only a year and a half after having it, which I feel is too short of a time to quit for the amount of money they cost. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2006-01-21 | | Too unreliable for the cost | 4 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | The Forerunner 301 seems like a great idea, but basically fails to deliver on every level. I have used it about 25 times in just over over a month and am quite disappointed. The odometer and pace meter are inconsistent . I use the lap function so that the Forerunner automatically records a lap at each mile. Though I typically run about an 8-minute pace, approximately every other run the Forerunner records a mile in the 5-6 minute/mile range, which not only skews the average pace of my run but also the distance. Everytime I use the Forerunner, the instantaneous readings constantly jump from the low 5's to almost a 10 minute/mile pace. On a number of occassions, the Forerunner has lost the GPS signal and stopped recording distance altogether. To its credit, over the course of an entire run, the distance reading seems more or less consistent and accurate (I have checked with my car). However, I have run side-by-side with others using a Forerunner and we got distances that differed by about 80 meters. It's just to erratic to be worth the cost. The elevation function is so unreliable that it's useless. I start from the exact same place every time I run and according to the Forerunner my starting elevation has varied from 180 to over 400 feet with just about everything in between. I run 5 miles and it typically gives me 4.5 miles of elevation readings. Where did the other half mile go? Did I lose at the start, middle, or end? Many others have commented negatively on the heart rate monitor and my experiences echo theirs. It loses contact, jumps around though my effort level remains the same, and generally is too variable to be a useful training tool. All of these problems are made worse by the fact that you cannot edit the data once you have it loaded into your computer. I'm preparing for a marathon and would like to keep track of my average pace per mile over the course of my training, but this is impossible as the Forerunner routinely throws a five-minute mile into my workout. If you could edit the data, at least you could balance your own judgment against the Forerunner's readings and adjust its mistakes. I should note that I live in suburban Connecticut, not an area that you would expect to get poor GPS reception. There is tree coverage, which no doubt interferes with the GPS. Others have made complaints about problems in urban areas. So, if it does not work predictably in a city or where there are trees, other than a beach or desert just where should one use the Forerunner? The short of it is, the Forerunner is so inaccurate that it simply is not worth the considerable cost. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 4 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-12-29 | | Not reliable enough for the price | 4 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I have had my Garmin Forerunner 301 for about nine months. During that time I have seen it has some good points but it fails significantly in several ways. I'll start with the Garmin 301's best point(s): It is an excellent GPS device for a runner. I have done several organized races on certified courses which proved the Garmin GPS is an excellent distance gauge. Your stride length can vary greatly with no affect. I have not seen anyone run with a Polar foot pod and get nearly as precise measurements as I get from the Garmin. I just ran the California International Marathon with the Garmin. At the finish, it said 26.2 miles. Compare that to the Polar with foot pod my brother was wearing that said almost 28 miles. The only time I have found Garmin's GPS questionable has been on winding trail runs under trees. Coupled with its ability to measure distance is the Garmin's setting for automatically tagging and storing mile splits. I love this function. Often times after a really long run, it's difficult to remember how you felt over certain areas of the course. This function means you don't have to remember anything. It's there. I also like that it will tell me elevation, and even the steepness of the grade I am running up. This is especially nice if you are a trail runner. However, I don't like that it won't tally the total elevation change like a Polar will. The speed and pace measurements displayed while in motion are a valuable gauge. I know of no device that does it better for a runner. But the accuracy can vary widely depending upon your overhead view. Clear sky generates an accurate reading. Throw a tree or a building in the mix and forget it. I have accepted this for what it is, a relative gauge that requires me to factor in my own judgment. If you are a really serious athlete, you might want something that will run a little longer from a single charge. It isn't waterproof and it crashes periodically with no way to reset until the battery actually dies completely. The heart rate feature, the one thing that supposedly makes this device worth $100 more than the Garmin 201, is actually its least reliable feature!! They owe me a hundred bucks! The unreliability of the heart rate monitor on this device should be so embarrassing to Garmin, it warrants a recall. Search the web. It's horrible. I routinely see readings over 220BPM. There is less than a 50/50 chance it will even READ my heart rate through an entire workout. Between the CONSTANT spikes and signal drops, there is no such thing as really knowing your average heart rate. I have given up on the heart rate function. It's a negative distraction from my training. As a result, I would not buy another Garmin 301. I would not recommend one to my friend. I would even go out of my way to dissuade a casual acquaintance from buying one if I found out they were considering it! Customer service: I sent an eight-year old monitor back to Polar with a dead battery. For the cost of shipping they sent me a whole new monitor. I sent an email to Garmin telling them I thought their product had some strong points but could benefit from a few improvements. I offered specific suggestions about the software and offered to provide any additional necessary feedback. Garmin didn't even send an automated reply. With all these factors in mind, I bought my wife a Polar heart rate monitor and a Garmin 101 for Christmas. Together, they cost less than I spent on my Garmin 301, and the combination will provide the same information far more reliably. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 4 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-12-09 | | Mac v. PC | 8 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | The only difficulty I have with this product is that the software is not Mac compatible. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-10-27 | | great partner | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I am training for my 1st marathon. Without my Garmin I would not be able to track my miles and speed. I love that it has a hart rate monitor because I also like to track the calories I burn, and to stay in my fat burning zone. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-10-26 | | ForeRunner 301 - close to perfect | 8 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | All around the best workout tool I have used to date. I am definately a "gadget buff" so I have tried MANY other toys. The best feature about this tool is the ability to download your workouts to you computer to track your progress. I even use it when on a stationary bike or treadmill so that I can track my heartrate & download it to my computer. Gripes - I am not happy with the chest strap. I am 6'5" and workout on a regular basis so I have a fairly large chest. The strap is big enough, but I cannot find a happy medium when it comes to fit. No matter how tight I try to make it, the strap still tries to slide down to my waste as I breath in & out. I would also like the strap for the reciever to be bigger so that I could wear it on my upper arm. (too small even with the extension strap) The final gripe is that the GPS is useless in the woods. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-10-25 | | Excellent product | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | The Garmin Forerunner GPS with heart rate monitor is excellent. It is easy to use and has a configurable display allowing me to put the Lap Pace in Large numbers and the Heart Rate, Lap Distance and Lap Time in smaller numbers, yet still readable. When I am more interested in my Heart Rate as the big number, it is easy to reconfigure the display with a push of a button. The product was delivered very fast, I am very happy with Amazon's service. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-10-22 | | A few kinks | 8 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Well I bought my first 301 for me and it worked great. I bought a second one for my wife locally and when I tried to enter her name as a new user it would not read her device even though the computer said it was connected. The device worked great in reading her heart rate and position but just would connect to the software. I called Garmin and they sent me through some tests and determined that it was the unit and to send it back, taking weeks. I returned it to the store for an exchange and it too would not connect to the software. So I went to the Garmin site and downloaded the most recent version of the software and...that fixed the porblem. HOWEVER now this unit would not pick up her heart rate. We called and tried to get the first unit back but no luck. So we got a third unit locally and it has worked great...So now, we love the thing and we both use it 3 times per week and the software works great. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-10-04 | | Great Running Tool | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | I have had the Forerunner 301 for about six weeks. I love it! It has worked great. Some reviews complain about the heartrate monitor, but I have had no problems. If you want a device to keep track of all elements of your running, this is it. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | | | Amazon.com customer | 2005-10-04 | | Excellent device. | 10 | NR | NR | NR | | | | Helpful? | Does exactly what it says. The chest strap HRM runs fine for me, no complaints. The GPS works as well as any GPS ever does, which is good if you have good visibility of the sky. There are a few good websites which will take uploads of your 301's data and clean it up & map it. | Satisfaction | Score |
|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 10 |
|
| | | | | |
| |